Skip to main content

40 Oz Bounce


As I'm sure most of you know mayor Bloomberg has put in motion a plan to stop the selling of any sugary beverage that is over 16 Ozs at restaurants, stadiums, and  other venues. Stating obesity as the reason for this change, Bloomberg has received criticism from New Yorkers who feel that the government has no right dictating how they enjoy their sugary drinks. One has to obey their thirsty even if that thirst comes from diabetes.  Without question this "new rule", is a conversation starter because nothing like it has been done before. There might be long term benefits such as healthier, slimmer New Yorkers which may create more space seat space on trains and buses. Seriously though, the stated reason by Bloomberg was a concern for public obesity and the ailments that come along with being overweight. This lead me to think of another beverage that affects public health, alcohol. Almost every New Yorker can attest to the disruptive nature of people who have had one too many drinks. Whether its a homeless person, an individual from a non profit residence, loud newly minted 21 yr olds or washed up old heads, alcohol brings the asshole out in everyone. Since Bloomberg is speaking Trap talk oz's and pounds, why not start with banning the sale of 40 oz beers, maybe even 22 Oz's. Beers of only 16 Oz should be sold in corner stores and gas stations, just a suggestion. Imagine the potential impact this can have on alcoholism. Sure people could buy more that one 16 Oz can but maybe there is some truth to this reverse psychological stuff that Bloomy is talking about. Throughout his soda campaign, mayor Bloomberg has cited studies that suggest people are more likely to have only one sugary drink of that's what's in front of them. So by logic shouldn't this work in the case of 40 Oz beers. I would love to see how a ban on the sale of 40 and 22Oz beers would affect my neighborhood of East New York as well as places like Brownsville, Bed Stuy, Harlem and the Bronx. I know that this won't eliminate alcoholism in NYC but it would send a strong message that public health is more than protection from airborne diseases and zombie attacks its about finding creative ways to solve problems. I'm sure the public won't oppose something like this, I'm more confident that areas around NYC where two or three non profit residences are on one block won't be opposed to a measure banning 40 oz's.

 Battling obesity, is a commendable thing to do, however, direction from the government on how much soda to drink with my meal when I'm out is too close to Big Brother for me. Regulating liquor, however, is something that I'm down for, after all prohibition was a real thing. I believe a ban of this nature would have a stronger impact than a sugary drink ban and would be welcomed with open arms in a city that had a quality of life campaign by the previous mayor. Maybe I should run for mayor now that I think about it, I got nothing to lose except my privacy and life if I get enough haters. All jokes aside, I'm apolitical for now and don't see any change in the future, the TV show Boss has confirmed my suspicions about elected office. I'll stick to talking unfiltered shit on the internet. Back to the business at hand, ask yourself why a similar approach can't be applied to alcoholic beverages. Alcohol causes deaths the same way obesity does, many times in ways more tragic than being overweight can. I don't see Bloomy asking for limits on how much rum and cokes a person can have, but maybe he needs to and people will start to take him serious, well people in neighborhoods where I'm from. Its going to be interesting to see how the city will adapt to this new Big Brother tactic from a little mayor lol.

 On that note I'll be checking in with you again with more thought provoking blog post. Pray for me because grad school and working in social service is kicking my ass. I feel like I need a 40 oz of St. Ides right now. Later folks !!!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Trickiness of White People

In Fenway park on Monday during a game of America's past time, baseball not racism Adam Jones, a Black centerfielder for the Baltimore Orioles was heckled by Boston Red Sox fans,  not for his play on the field but for what some fans thought he was in their eyes…a Nigga and someone to throw peanuts at.  After the story picked up traction in the news, Boston Red Sox president Sam Kennedy condemned the actions of the fans and encouraged fans at the following night's game to give Jones a standing ovation, which they did.  Herein lies the problem I have with this whole situation.  White people somehow are allowed to mask the disgusting acts of one or a few members of their community with a show of emotion, avoiding any attempts to pathologize the act (Elizabeth Hasslebeck crying over the N word), while minorities are left explaining the actions of everyone in their community from rappers to 17 year olds who have been killed for no other reason than them being Black. (What about Bl…

You Better Watch What You Say (or at least who you say it to)

I’m sure by now at least 80 percent of America has heard what Los Angeles Clippers owner Donald Sterling had to say on a secretly recorded audio tape, or at least seen Donald Sterling and racist in the same headline, the rest must not have a TV or internet connection. I’m sure 100 percent of sports fans have heard the hateful words of an owner, revealing his feelings about minorities as well as his inner feeling towards women and the space both occupy in the world according to Donald Sterling. As juicy as the details to this story are, especially the fact that the NAACP was about to give Mr.Sterling a second Lifetime Achievement Award, there are so many angles to this story we have to break this one into several parts; Ownership, Culture, Racism.               “Structure” …… “WHITE POWER STRUCTURE”.  What did you feel when you read those words…”WHITE POWER STRUCTURE”, better yet what do you think about when you read the words “BLACK POWER STRUCTURE”. Which one sounds more believable?…

Maxed Out

I've been meaning to write this blog for the longest but that annoying little thing called procrastination crept up and held me hostage. Nevertheless, I still want to share my opinion on this because I'm an opinionated dude and I'm on a mission to finish what I start. Rapper Max B had his appeal denied at the end of August, meaning that he will likely spend the rest of his life in prison. He received a 75 year sentence for his role in a 2006 robbery. Between 1997-2005, Max was incarcerated on robbery charges.  A few years back Max B was tearing up the underground ago rap scene with his unique rap style, use of the term "wavey" and his burgeoning beef with Dipset member Jim Jones. Now he and his fans only have memories and songs to keep the wave going. Many of these fans, myself included, were holding on to the idea that the appeal would be granted and Max B would return to producing good music.
I remember not being impressed by Max B when I first heard him on s…